Wrongful Death Lawsuit

When a loved one’s life is tragically and prematurely ended by the careless, reckless, or intentional actions of another, legal avenues exist to address this profound injustice. It’s crucial to understand that a loved one’s unexpected passing may not be a random event, but rather a direct result of someone else’s negligence.

If you suspect you have a case, it’s essential to consult with an experienced wrongful death lawyer. You can contact Belal Hamideh through this platform or by phone.

Experienced Wrongful Death Legal Counsel

The sudden loss of a cherished individual due to another’s negligence is devastating. Actions stemming from recklessness or thoughtlessness can lead to the most unfortunate of outcomes. While no amount of money can replace a loved one, you have the legal right to seek compensation. Partnering with a skilled wrongful death lawyer can strengthen your case and streamline the process of securing financial recovery for funeral expenses, medical bills, and the emotional distress caused by such a tragic event.

wrongful death attorney

Belal Hamideh, a distinguished wrongful death legal representative based in California, has a proven track record of successfully resolving numerous wrongful death lawsuits. His extensive experience allows him to vigorously advocate for your case, ensuring you receive the maximum financial relief to address both emotional and economic losses. Belal offers a complimentary case evaluation to assess your claim’s potential and explain how he can assist you.

Grasping the Definition of Wrongful Death

Under California law, wrongful death occurs when one person’s wrongful actions lead to another’s death. These actions can range from negligent and reckless behavior to intentional harm. If the act was deliberate, the responsible party may also face criminal charges.

If you find yourself in such a distressing situation, you may have grounds to file a wrongful death lawsuit. When unsure about your legal rights, consulting with an experienced attorney is highly recommended.

Validating a Wrongful Death Lawsuit

A successful wrongful death lawsuit requires proving four key elements. The primary focus is demonstrating that the defendant’s negligent or reckless behavior directly caused your loved one’s death. Even if the defendant’s actions were partially responsible, your claim may still be valid.

Secondly, you must prove the defendant owed a duty of care to your deceased loved one. This duty varies depending on the circumstances, such as a doctor’s duty to a patient or a driver’s duty to obey traffic laws.

Next, it must be proven that the defendant’s breach of this duty resulted in your loved one’s death. Finally, evidence must substantiate the tangible damages resulting from your loved one’s death, including medical expenses, funeral costs, lost income, emotional distress, and potential loss of guidance, protection, and inheritance.

Navigating a wrongful death lawsuit can be complex. However, with a seasoned attorney like Belal Hamideh by your side, you can approach this journey with confidence. Leveraging his extensive experience in California wrongful death cases, Belal provides the dedicated representation you need to pursue the justice you deserve.

Deciphering the Payment Structure in California’s Wrongful Death Cases

A common question is: What compensation can be expected in a wrongful death case in California? Compensation generally falls into two categories: economic and non-economic damages. Economic damages cover tangible expenses like funeral and burial costs, medical bills, and lost earnings. Non-economic damages address emotional distress, loss of companionship, and loss of support.

Despite the challenge of assigning monetary value to intangible damages, the commitment to securing maximum compensation remains unwavering.

Scrutinizing Potential Damages in Wrongful Death Cases 

Compensation is influenced by various factors, including the deceased’s age at the time of death and the claimant’s life expectancy.

Economic damages primarily cover expenses such as funeral and burial costs, lost financial support, loss of household services, and potential gifts or benefits from the deceased.

Non-economic damages address the emotional impact of the loss, including emotional support, companionship, protection, moral guidance, and loss of consortium.

It’s important to note that California law does not allow punitive damages in wrongful death lawsuits. To seek punitive damages, a survival action must be filed alongside the wrongful death claim if both arise from the same wrongful act.

During your consultation with Belal, he will use his expertise to assess your case and develop a strategic plan to maximize your potential outcome.

wrongful death lawyer

wrongful death lawyer

Comprehending Compensation Rights in Wrongful Death Claims

Understanding who can seek compensation in a wrongful death claim is crucial. Typically, the immediate family—spouses and children—are the primary claimants. If there are no dependents or immediate family, the deceased’s parents may be eligible.

Navigating the eligibility requirements for wrongful death compensation can be complex and lead to uncertainty. Consulting with an experienced wrongful death attorney like Belal Hamideh is essential.

Belal Hamideh: Reliable Advocate in California for Wrongful Death

The grief of losing a loved one is compounded when the death results from someone else’s negligence. In these moments, having a skilled wrongful death lawyer like Belal Hamideh can be invaluable. Belal manages every aspect of your case with dedication and thoroughness, providing much-needed relief during this challenging time.

Belal and his team prioritize client support, taking full control of the legal process. They understand the difficulties of grieving while managing legal complexities. By handling these matters, they allow clients to focus on mourning and remembering their loved ones.

Upon taking a case, Belal’s team conducts a thorough investigation to understand the circumstances leading to the wrongful death. By identifying all parties involved, they build a strong case. If multiple parties are liable, they ensure each is held accountable.

Throughout this process, Belal and his team provide guidance, updates, and emotional support. Recognizing the emotional toll of loss, they aim to offer clarity, reassurance, and hope.

Making Sense of the Fee Structure

Belal Hamideh’s firm operates on a contingency fee basis, meaning clients do not pay upfront. Instead, the fee is deducted from the final settlement or judgment. This policy alleviates financial strain during a difficult time.

Payment is due only if the case is successful. While some parties may attempt to avoid just compensation, Belal and his team have the skills to counter such strategies. They pride themselves on their 99% success rate and are committed to securing fair compensation.

Belal also collaborates with healthcare professionals who work on a contingency basis, ensuring clients receive necessary medical care without upfront costs. This holistic approach makes Belal Hamideh a reliable choice for Californians seeking justice.

Differentiating Between “Wrongful Death” and “Homicide”

A single event can potentially trigger both a wrongful death lawsuit and a criminal charge. An important point to bear in mind is the crucial difference between these two legal concepts.

Wrongful death cases are civil lawsuits that aim to secure financial compensation for the survivors. Heirs can claim both economic and emotional damages.

In contrast, criminal homicide cases imply that the defendant is being charged criminally, potentially leading to incarceration.

Comparing Evidence Requirements and Deadlines in Wrongful Death and Criminal Homicide Cases

Evidence requirements differ significantly between criminal and civil cases. Criminal trials require proof beyond a reasonable doubt, while civil lawsuits require a preponderance of evidence.

Despite the lighter evidence requirement in civil cases, engaging a skilled attorney greatly increases the likelihood of a successful outcome.

Wrongful death lawsuits in California have a two-year statute of limitations from the date of death. This timeframe can be shorter if the government is involved.

These legal complexities can be daunting, and strict compliance with deadlines is crucial. Any delay could result in losing the ability to seek legal recourse.

Timeframe for Filing a Wrongful Death Lawsuit in California

In California, wrongful death lawsuits have a two-year statute of limitations. This stipulates a two-year duration from the date of death to file a wrongful death lawsuit.

This timeframe, however, can erode rapidly as you handle other affairs following a death. The window narrows to just six months if the government is a defendant.

These legal intricacies can be daunting and perplexing. Strict compliance with these deadlines is crucial, as any delay could mean losing the ability to seek legal recourse. Care must be taken to ensure that everyone gets the chance to pursue justice for an untimely demise.

Factors Affecting Wrongful Death Compensation

Understanding the crucial elements that affect the value of your wrongful death claim requires a strategic examination of all potential factors that could influence its value. Each state, including California, has definitive laws regarding damages. Notably, California imposes no caps on damages, thus allowing juries to potentially award significant compensations in wrongful death cases.

Aspects like the age of the deceased, the number of minor children and their respective ages, the particulars of the accident, the level of financial dependence on the deceased by the spouse can all affect case evaluations. These factors can either increase or decrease a family’s settlement.

For instance, a case involving the death of an elderly family member, with no surviving spouse or children, and who shares a significant portion of the blame for the incident, will likely result in a smaller settlement. Conversely, a case featuring a deceased person with dependents and minimal fault can anticipate a sizable compensation.

Belal Hamideh, dedicated to your defense, carefully scrutinizes your case and then devises a targeted strategy potentially beneficial for you.

The passing of a loved one due to another’s negligence can undoubtedly be one of the most challenging trials you face. Belal Hamideh, a highly esteemed Wrongful Death Lawyer based in California, acknowledges that he can’t alleviate the ordeal you’re experiencing, but he is wholly committed to easing your burden. He is steadfast in his mission to protect your rights, using his comprehensive knowledge and experience to help you secure the most considerable compensation for your tragic loss. Get in touch with us via our website or call us for a free case evaluation.

California Wrongful Death Laws 

These laws may pertain to your situation. If you have further questions, contact Belal. 

California Code of Civil Procedure

CCP § 377.60

A cause of action for the death of a person caused by the wrongful act or neglect of another may be asserted by any of the following persons or by the decedent’s personal representative on their behalf:

(a) The decedent’s surviving spouse, domestic partner, children, and issue of deceased children, or, if there is no surviving issue of the decedent, the persons, including the surviving spouse or domestic partner, who would be entitled to the property of the decedent by intestate succession.If the parents of the decedent would be entitled to bring an action under this subdivision, and the parents are deceased, then the legal guardians of the decedent, if any, may bring an action under this subdivision as if they were the decedent’s parents.

(b)(1) Whether or not qualified under subdivision (a), if they were dependent on the decedent, the putative spouse, children of the putative spouse, stepchildren, parents, or the legal guardians of the decedent if the parents are deceased.

(2) As used in this subdivision, “putative spouse” means the surviving spouse of a void or voidable marriage who is found by the court to have believed in good faith that the marriage to the decedent was valid.

(c) A minor, whether or not qualified under subdivision (a) or (b), if, at the time of the decedent’s death, the minor resided for the previous 180 days in the decedent’s household and was dependent on the decedent for one-half or more of the minor’s support.

(d) This section applies to any cause of action arising on or after January 1, 1993.

(e) The addition of this section by Chapter 178 of the Statutes of 1992 was not intended to adversely affect the standing of any party having standing under prior law, and the standing of parties governed by that version of this section as added by Chapter 178 of the Statutes of 1992 shall be the same as specified herein as amended by Chapter 563 of the Statutes of 1996.

(f)(1) For the purpose of this section, “domestic partner” means a person who, at the time of the decedent’s death, was the domestic partner of the decedent in a registered domestic partnership established in accordance with subdivision (b) of Section 297 of the Family Code.

(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), for a death occurring prior to January 1, 2002, a person may maintain a cause of action pursuant to this section as a domestic partner of the decedent by establishing the factors listed in paragraphs (1) to (6), inclusive, of subdivision (b) of Section 297 of the Family Code, as it read pursuant to Section 3 of Chapter 893 of the Statutes of 2001, prior to its becoming inoperative on January 1, 2005.

(3) The amendments made to this subdivision during the 2003-04 Regular Session of the Legislature are not intended to revive any cause of action that has been fully and finally adjudicated by the courts, or that has been settled, or as to which the applicable limitations period has run.

CCP § 335.1

Within two years: An action for assault, battery, or injury to, or for the death of, an individual caused by the wrongful act or neglect of another.

CCP § 377.61

In an action under this article, damages may be awarded that, under all the circumstances of the case, may be just, but may not include damages recoverable under Section 377.34. The court shall determine the respective rights in an award of the persons entitled to assert the cause of action.

CCP § 377.34

(a) In an action or proceeding by a decedent’s personal representative or successor in interest on the decedent’s cause of action, the damages recoverable are limited to the loss or damage that the decedent sustained or incurred before death, including any penalties or punitive or exemplary damages that the decedent would have been entitled to recover had the decedent lived, and do not include damages for pain, suffering, or disfigurement.

(b) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), in an action or proceeding by a decedent’s personal representative or successor in interest on the decedent’s cause of action, the damages recoverable may include damages for pain, suffering, or disfigurement if the action or proceeding was granted a preference pursuant to Section 36 before January 1, 2022, or was filed on or after January 1, 2022, and before January 1, 2026.

(c) A plaintiff who recovers damages pursuant to subdivision (b) between January 1, 2022, and January 1, 2025, inclusive, shall, within 60 days after obtaining a judgment, consent judgment, or court-approved settlement agreement entitling the plaintiff to the damages, submit to the Judicial Council a copy of the judgment, consent judgment, or court-approved settlement agreement, along with a cover sheet detailing all of the following information:

(1) The date the action was filed.

(2) The date of the final disposition of the action.

(3) The amount and type of damages awarded, including economic damages and damages for pain, suffering, or disfigurement.

(d)(1) On or before January 1, 2025, the Judicial Council shall transmit to the Legislature a report detailing the information received pursuant to subdivision (c) for all judgements, consent judgements, or court-approved settlement agreements rendered from January 1, 2022, to July 31, 2024, inclusive, in which damages were recovered pursuant to subdivision (b). The report shall comply with Section 9795 of the Government Code.

(2) This subdivision shall become inoperative on January 1, 2029, pursuant to Section 10231.5 of the Government Code.

(e) Nothing in this section alters Section 3333.2 of the Civil Code.

(f) Nothing in this section affects claims brought pursuant to Chapter 11 (commencing with Section 15600) of Part 3 of Division 9 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.