What to do when your UBER gets in an accident?

Should you encounter an accident while on an UBER trip, your first priority is to verify your well-being.

If your condition allows, check on the safety of your fellow passengers too. Don’t hesitate to dial 911 if anyone appears injured.

Even in the absence of any visible injuries, it’s worth visiting a hospital as some injuries may be concealed by the initial shock. Filing a police report once the authorities arrive is also of utmost importance.

Collecting evidence is another vital step; jot down the Uber driver’s information along with that of all parties involved in the incident, as well as any eyewitnesses. If circumstances permit, capture photographs of the accident scene and any injuries incurred. Remember to record the exact place of the accident for future use.

Finally, seek legal counsel. You may be eligible for damages, and a skilled attorney can walk you through the claim process.

This holds true no matter if you are an UBER passenger, UBER driver, or an individual struck by an UBER. While a lawsuit against UBER is almost unachievable, compensation for your injuries is still a viable option.

If you believe you were injured in an accident involving UBER, it’s worth it to schedule a free case evaluation with experienced UBER accident attorney Belal to see how he can help. 

Laws That May Pertain to Your UBER Accident 

 

These laws could be pertinent to your situation. Belal can help you to know what your case is worth and then he can help you to receive it. 

 

2009 California Civil Code – Section 3274-3275 :: Title 1. Relief In General

CIVIL CODE

SECTION 3274-3275

  1. As a general rule, compensation is the relief or remedy

provided by the law of this State for the violation of private

rights, and the means of securing their observance; and specific and

preventive relief may be given in no other cases than those specified

in this Part of the CIVIL CODE.

 

  1. Whenever, by the terms of an obligation, a party thereto

incurs a forfeiture, or a loss in the nature of a forfeiture, by

reason of his failure to comply with its provisions, he may be

relieved therefrom, upon making full compensation to the other party,

except in case of a grossly negligent, willful, or fraudulent breach

of duty.

 

2009 California Civil Code – Section 3300-3322 :: Article 1. Damages For Breach Of Contract

CIVIL CODE

SECTION 3300-3322

[3300.]  Section Thirty-three Hundred. For the breach of an

obligation arising from contract, the measure of damages, except

where otherwise expressly provided by this Code, is the amount which

will compensate the party aggrieved for all the detriment proximately

caused thereby, or which, in the ordinary course of things, would be

likely to result therefrom.

 

  1. No damages can be recovered for a breach of contract which

are not clearly ascertainable in both their nature and origin.

 

  1. The detriment caused by the breach of an obligation to pay

money only, is deemed to be the amount due by the terms of the

obligation, with interest thereon.

 

  1. The detriment caused by the breach of a covenant of “seizin,”

of “right to convey,” of “warranty,” or of “quiet enjoyment,” in a

grant of an estate in real property, is deemed to be:

  1. The price paid to the grantor; or, if the breach is partial

only, such proportion of the price as the value of the property

affected by the breach bore at the time of the grant to the value of

the whole property;

  1. Interest thereon for the time during which the grantee derived

no benefit from the property, not exceeding five years;

  1. Any expenses properly incurred by the covenantee in defending

his possession.

 

  1. The detriment caused by the breach of a covenant against

incumbrances in a grant of an estate in real property is deemed to be

the amount which has been actually expended by the covenantee in

extinguishing either the principal or interest thereof, not exceeding

in the former case a proportion of the price paid to the grantor

equivalent to the relative value at the time of the grant of the

property affected by the breach, as compared with the whole, or, in

the latter case, interest on a like amount.

 

  1. The detriment caused by the breach of an agreement to convey

an estate in real property, is deemed to be the price paid, and the

expenses properly incurred in examining the title and preparing the

necessary papers, the difference between the price agreed to be paid

and the value of the estate agreed to be conveyed at the time of the

breach, the expenses properly incurred in preparing to enter upon the

land, consequential damages according to proof, and interest.

 

3306a.  The minimum detriment caused by the breach of an agreement

to execute and deliver a quitclaim deed to real property is deemed to

be the expenses incurred by the promisee in quieting title to such

property, and the expenses incidental to the entry upon such

property. Such expenses which shall include reasonable attorneys’

fees shall be fixed by the court in the quiet title action.

 

  1. The detriment caused by the breach of an agreement to

purchase an estate in real property is deemed to be the excess, if

any, of the amount which would have been due to the seller under the

contract over the value of the property to him or her, consequential

damages according to proof, and interest.

 

  1. The parties to any lease of real or personal property may

agree therein that if the lease shall be terminated by the lessor by

reason of any breach thereof by the lessee, the lessor shall

thereupon be entitled to recover from the lessee the worth at the

time of the termination, of the excess, if any, of the amount of rent

and charges equivalent to rent reserved in the lease for the balance

of the stated term or any shorter period of time over the then

reasonable rental value of the property for the same period.

   The rights of the lessor under the agreement shall be cumulative

to all other rights or remedies now or hereafter given to the lessor

by law or by the terms of the lease; provided, however, that the

election of the lessor to exercise the remedy hereinabove permitted

shall be binding upon him or her and exclude recourse thereafter to

any other remedy for rental or charges equivalent to rental or

damages for breach of the covenant to pay the rent or charges

accruing subsequent to the time of the termination. The parties to

the lease may further agree therein that unless the remedy provided

by this section is exercised by the lessor within a specified time

the right thereto shall be barred.

   This section does not apply to a lease of real property unless (a)

the lease was executed before July 1, 1971, or (b) the terms of the

lease were fixed by a lease, option, or other agreement executed

before July 1, 1971.

   This section does not apply to leases subject to Division 10

(commencing with Section 10101) of the Commercial Code.

 

  1. The detriment caused by the breach of a carrier’s obligation

to accept freight, messages, or passengers, is deemed to be the

difference between the amount which he had a right to charge for the

carriage and the amount which it would be necessary to pay for the

same service when it ought to be performed.

 

  1. The detriment caused by the breach of a carrier’s obligation

to deliver freight, where he has not converted it to his own use, is

deemed to be the value thereof at the place and on the day at which

it should have been delivered, deducting the freightage to which he

would have been entitled if he had completed the delivery.

 

  1. The detriment caused by a carrier’s delay in the delivery of

freight, is deemed to be the depreciation in the intrinsic value of

the freight during the delay, and also the depreciation, if any, in

the market value thereof, otherwise than by reason of a depreciation

in its intrinsic value, at the place where it ought to have been

delivered, and between the day at which it ought to have been

delivered, and the day of its actual delivery.

 

  1. The detriment caused by the breach of a warranty of an agent’

s authority, is deemed to be the amount which could have been

recovered and collected from his principal if the warranty had been

complied with, and the reasonable expenses of legal proceedings

taken, in good faith, to enforce the act of the agent against his

principal.

 

  1. (a) In each written contract for private works of improvement

entered into on or after January 1, 1996, the contracting party and

the design professional may agree to contractual provisions that

include a late payment penalty, in lieu of any interest otherwise

due. The terms of the late payment penalty shall be specifically set

forth in the written contract.

   (b) The penalty authorized pursuant to subdivision (a) shall be

separate from, and in addition to, the design professionals’ liens

provided by Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 3081.1) of Title 14 of

Part 4 of Division 3, mechanics’ liens provided by Chapter 2

(commencing with Section 3109) of Title 15 of Part 4 of Division 3,

and stop notices for private works provided in Chapter 3 (commencing

with Section 3156) of Title 15 of Part 4 of Division 3.

   (c) None of the rights or obligations created or permitted by this

section between design professionals and contracting parties shall

apply to construction loan funds held by a lender pursuant to a

construction loan agreement.

   (d) For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:

   (1) “Contracting party” means any person or entity entering into a

written contract with a design professional for professional design

services for a private work of improvement.

   (2) “Design professional” means a person licensed as an architect

pursuant to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 5500) of Division 3 of

the Business and Professions Code, registered as a professional

engineer pursuant to Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 6700) of

Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code, or licensed as a

land surveyor pursuant to Chapter 15 (commencing with Section 8700)

of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code.

 

  1. (a) In each contract for public works of improvement, entered

into on or after January 1, 1996, the public agency shall pay to the

prime design professional any progress payment within 30 days of

receipt of a written demand for payment in accordance with the

contract, and the final retention payment within 45 days of receipt

of a written demand for payment in accordance with the contract. If

the public agency disputes in good faith any portion of the amount

due, it may withhold from the payment an amount not to exceed 150

percent of the disputed amount. The disputed amount withheld is not

subject to any penalty authorized by this section.

   (b) If any amount is wrongfully withheld or is not timely paid in

violation of this section, the prime design professional shall be

entitled to a penalty of 1 1/2 percent for the improperly withheld

amount, in lieu of any interest otherwise due, per month for every

month that payment is not made. In any action for the collection of

amounts withheld in violation of this section, the prevailing party

is entitled to his or her reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.

   (c) The penalty described in subdivision (b) is separate from, and

in addition to, the design professionals’ liens provided by Chapter

8 (commencing with Section 3081.1) of Title 14 of Part 4 of Division

3, mechanics’ liens provided by Chapter 2 (commencing with Section

3109) of Title 15 of Part 4 of Division 3, and stop notices for

public works provided in Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 3156) of

Title 15 of Part 4 of Division 3.

   (d) This section does not apply to state agency contracts subject

to Section 927.6 of the Government Code.

   (e) None of the rights or obligations created by this section

between prime design professionals and public agencies apply to

construction loan funds held by a lender pursuant to a construction

loan agreement.

   (f) For purposes of this section:

   (1) “Public agency” means the state, any county, any city, any

city and county, any district, any public authority, any public

agency, any municipal corporation or other political subdivision or

political corporation of the state.

   (2) “Design professional” means a person licensed as an architect

pursuant to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 5500) of Division 3 of

the Business and Professions Code, registered as a professional

engineer pursuant to Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 6700) of

Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code, or licensed as a

land surveyor pursuant to Chapter 15 (commencing with Section 8700)

of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code.

   (3) “Prime design professional” means a design professional with a

written contract directly with the public agency.

 

  1. (a) In each contract for public works of improvement, a prime

design professional shall pay to each subconsultant design

professional the amount due him or her from the payment received, not

later than 15 days after receipt of each progress payment or final

retention payment. If the prime design professional disputes in good

faith any portion of the amount due, he or she may withhold from the

payment an amount not to exceed 150 percent of the disputed amount.

The disputed amount withheld shall not be subject to any penalty

authorized by this section.

   (b) If any amount is wrongfully withheld or is not timely paid in

violation of this section, the subconsultant design professional

shall be entitled to a penalty of 1 1/2 percent of the improperly

withheld amount, in lieu of any interest otherwise due, per month,

for each month that payment is not made. In any action for the

collection of amounts withheld in violation of this section, the

prevailing party shall be entitled to his or her reasonable attorney’

s fees and costs.

   (c) The penalty described in subdivision (b) shall be separate

from, and in addition to, the design professionals’ liens provided by

Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 3081.1) of Title 14 of Part 4 of

Division 3, mechanics’ liens provided by Chapter 2 (commencing with

Section 3109) of Title 15 of Part 4 of Division 3, and stop notices

for public works provided in Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 3156)

of Title 15 of Part 4 of Division 3.

   (d) None of the rights or obligations created by this section

between prime design professionals and subconsultant design

professionals shall apply to construction loan funds held by a lender

pursuant to a construction loan agreement.

   (e) For purposes of this section:

   (1) “Public agency” means the state, any county, any city, any

city and county, any district, any public authority, any public

agency, any municipal corporation or other political subdivision or

political corporation of the state.

   (2) “Design professional” means a person licensed as an architect

pursuant to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 5500) of Division 3 of

the Business and Professions Code, registered as a professional

engineer pursuant to Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 6700) of

Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code, or licensed as a

land surveyor pursuant to Chapter 15 (commencing with Section 8700)

of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code.

   (3) “Prime design professional” means a design professional having

a written contract directly with the public agency.

   (4) “Subconsultant design professional” means a design

professional having a written contract with a prime design

professional.

 

  1. (a) (1) A broker of construction trucking services shall pay

all transportation charges submitted by a motor carrier of property

in dump truck equipment by the 25th day following the last day of the

calendar month in which the transportation was performed, if the

charges, including all necessary documentation, are submitted by the

fifth day following the last day of the calendar month in which the

transportation was performed. If there is a good faith dispute over a

portion of the charges claimed, the broker may withhold payment of

an amount not to exceed 150 percent of the estimated cost of the

disputed amount.

   (2) A broker who violates paragraph (1) shall pay to the motor

carrier of property in dump truck equipment a penalty of 2 percent

per month on the improperly withheld amount.

   (3) In an action for the collection of moneys not paid in

accordance with paragraph (1), the prevailing party shall be entitled

to his or her attorney’s fees and costs.

   (b) For purposes of subdivision (a), the following definitions

apply:

   (1) A “broker of construction trucking services” means any person,

excluding a licensed contractor, that, as a principal or agent,

arranges for transportation services to be provided by an independent

contractor motor carrier of property in dump truck equipment and who

is responsible for paying the transportation charges of the motor

carrier.

   (2) A “motor carrier of property in dump truck equipment” means a

motor carrier of property permitted by the Department of Motor

Vehicles that hauls any type of construction commodity or material in

dump truck equipment.

   (c) Subdivision (a) only applies if a motor carrier of property is

in compliance with Division 14.85 (commencing with Section 36000) of

the Vehicle Code at the time the dump truck transportation work is

performed.

 

2009 California Civil Code – Section 3333-3343.7 :: Article 2. Damages For Wrongs

CIVIL CODE

SECTION 3333-3343.7

  1. For the breach of an obligation not arising from contract,

the measure of damages, except where otherwise expressly provided by

this Code, is the amount which will compensate for all the detriment

proximately caused thereby, whether it could have been anticipated or

not.

 

3333.1.  (a) In the event the defendant so elects, in an action for

personal injury against a health care provider based upon

professional negligence, he may introduce evidence of any amount

payable as a benefit to the plaintiff as a result of the personal

injury pursuant to the United States Social Security Act, any state

or federal income disability or worker’s compensation act, any

health, sickness or income-disability insurance, accident insurance

that provides health benefits or income-disability coverage, and any

contract or agreement of any group, organization, partnership, or

corporation to provide, pay for, or reimburse the cost of medical,

hospital, dental, or other health care services. Where the defendant

elects to introduce such evidence, the plaintiff may introduce

evidence of any amount which the plaintiff has paid or contributed to

secure his right to any insurance benefits concerning which the

defendant has introduced evidence.

   (b) No source of collateral benefits introduced pursuant to

subdivision (a) shall recover any amount against the plaintiff nor

shall it be subrogated to the rights of the plaintiff against a

defendant.

   (c) For the purposes of this section:

   (1) “Health care provider” means any person licensed or certified

pursuant to Division 2 (commencing with Section 500) of the Business

and Professions Code, or licensed pursuant to the Osteopathic

Initiative Act, or the Chiropractic Initiative Act, or licensed

pursuant to Chapter 2.5 (commencing with Section 1440) of Division 2

of the Health and Safety Code; and any clinic, health dispensary, or

health facility, licensed pursuant to Division 2 (commencing with

Section 1200) of the Health and Safety Code. “Health care provider”

includes the legal representatives of a health care provider;

   (2) “Professional negligence” means a negligent act or omission to

act by a health care provider in the rendering of professional

services, which act or omission is the proximate cause of a personal

injury or wrongful death, provided that such services are within the

scope of services for which the provider is licensed and which are

not within any restriction imposed by the licensing agency or

licensed hospital.

 

3333.2.  (a) In any action for injury against a health care provider

based on professional negligence, the injured plaintiff shall be

entitled to recover noneconomic losses to compensate for pain,

suffering, inconvenience, physical impairment, disfigurement and

other nonpecuniary damage.

   (b) In no action shall the amount of damages for noneconomic

losses exceed two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000).

   (c) For the purposes of this section:

   (1) “Health care provider” means any person licensed or certified

pursuant to Division 2 (commencing with Section 500) of the Business

and Professions Code, or licensed pursuant to the Osteopathic

Initiative Act, or the Chiropractic Initiative Act, or licensed

pursuant to Chapter 2.5 (commencing with Section 1440) of Division 2

of the Health and Safety Code; and any clinic, health dispensary, or

health facility, licensed pursuant to Division 2 (commencing with

Section 1200) of the Health and Safety Code. “Health care provider”

includes the legal representatives of a health care provider;

   (2) “Professional negligence” means a negligent act or omission to

act by a health care provider in the rendering of professional

services, which act or omission is the proximate cause of a personal

injury or wrongful death, provided that such services are within the

scope of services for which the provider is licensed and which are

not within any restriction imposed by the licensing agency or

licensed hospital.

 

3333.3.  In any action for damages based on negligence, a person may

not recover any damages if the plaintiff’s injuries were in any way

proximately caused by the plaintiff’s commission of any felony, or

immediate flight therefrom, and the plaintiff has been duly convicted

of that felony.

 

3333.4.  (a) Except as provided in subdivision (c), in any action to

recover damages arising out of the operation or use of a motor

vehicle, a person shall not recover non-economic losses to compensate

for pain, suffering, inconvenience, physical impairment,

disfigurement, and other nonpecuniary damages if any of the following

applies:

   (1) The injured person was at the time of the accident operating

the vehicle in violation of Section 23152 or 23153 of the Vehicle

Code, and was convicted of that offense.

   (2) The injured person was the owner of a vehicle involved in the

accident and the vehicle was not insured as required by the financial

responsibility laws of this state.

   (3) The injured person was the operator of a vehicle involved in

the accident and the operator can not establish his or her financial

responsibility as required by the financial responsibility laws of

this state.

   (b) Except as provided in subdivision (c), an insurer shall not be

liable, directly or indirectly, under a policy of liability or

uninsured motorist insurance to indemnify for non-economic losses of

a person injured as described in subdivision (a).

   (c) In the event a person described in paragraph (2) of

subdivision (a) was injured by a motorist who at the time of the

accident was operating his or her vehicle in violation of Section

23152 or 23153 of the Vehicle Code, and was convicted of that

offense, the injured person shall not be barred from recovering

non-economic losses to compensate for pain, suffering, inconvenience,

physical impairment, disfigurement, and other nonpecuniary damages.

 

3333.5.  (a) Each pipeline corporation that qualifies as a public

utility within Section 216 of the Public Utilities Code that

transports any crude oil or fraction thereof in a public utility oil

pipeline system that meets the requirements of subdivision (h) shall

be absolutely liable without regard to fault for any damages incurred

by any injured party that arise out of, or are caused by, the

discharge or leaking of crude oil or fraction thereof from the public

utility pipeline.

   (b) A pipeline corporation is not liable to an injured party under

this section for any of the following:

   (1) Damages, other than costs of removal incurred by the state or

a local government caused solely by an act of war, hostilities, civil

war, or insurrection or by an unanticipated grave natural disaster

or other act of God of an exceptional, inevitable, and irresistible

character, other than an earthquake, which damages could not have

been prevented or avoided by the exercise of due care or foresight.

   (2) Damages in the proportion caused by the negligence,

intentional malfeasance, or criminal act of the landowner, or an

agent, employee, or contractor of the landowner, upon whose property

the pipeline system is located.

   (3) Except as provided by paragraph (2), damages caused solely by

the negligence or intentional malfeasance of the injured person.

   (4) Except as provided by paragraph (2), damages caused solely by

the criminal act of a third party other than the pipeline corporation

or an agent or employee of the pipeline corporation.

   (5) Natural seepage from sources other than the public utility oil

pipeline.

   (6) Damages that arise out of, or are caused by, a discharge that

is authorized by a state or federal permit.

   (c) Damages for which a pipeline corporation is liable under this

section are the following:

   (1) All costs of response, containment, cleanup, removal, and

treatment, including, but not limited to, monitoring and

administration costs.

   (2) Injury to, or economic losses resulting from destruction of or

injury to, real or personal property.

   (3) Injury to, destruction of, or loss of, natural resources,

including, but not limited to, the reasonable cost of rehabilitating

wildlife, habitat, and other resources and the reasonable cost of

assessing that injury, destruction, or loss, in any action brought by

the state, a county, city, or district.

   (4) Loss of taxes, royalties, rents, use, or profit shares caused

by the injury, destruction, loss, or impairment of use of real

property, personal property, or natural resources.

   (5) Loss of use and enjoyment of natural resources and other

public resources or facilities in any action brought by the state,

county, city, or district.

   (d) The court may award reasonable costs of the suit, attorneys’

fees, and the cost of any necessary expert witnesses to any

prevailing plaintiff. The court may award reasonable costs of the

suit, attorneys’ fees, and the cost of any necessary expert witnesses

to any prevailing defendant if the court finds that the plaintiff

commenced or prosecuted the suit under this section in bad faith or

solely for purposes of harassing the defendant.

   (e) (1) A pipeline corporation shall immediately clean up all

crude oil, or any fraction thereof, that leaks or is discharged from

a pipeline subject to this section. Additionally, the pipeline

corporation shall abate immediately, or as soon as practical, the

effects of the leak or discharge and take all other necessary

remedial action.

   (2) A pipeline corporation may recover the costs of the activities

specified in this section for which it is not at fault by means of

any otherwise available cause of action, including, but not limited

to, indemnification or subrogation.

   (f) This section shall not apply to claims, or causes of action,

for damages for personal injury or wrongful death.

   (g) This section shall not prohibit any party from bringing any

action for damages under any other provision or principle of law,

including but not limited to, common law. However, damages shall not

be awarded pursuant to this section to an injured party to the extent

the same party is or has been awarded damages for the same injury

under any other provision or principle of law.

   (h) This section shall only apply to all of the following:

   (1) The pipeline system proposed to be constructed by Pacific

Pipeline System, Inc., identified in Public Utilities Commission

Application No. 91-10-013, for which the maximum requirement of one

hundred million dollars ($100,000,000) set forth in paragraph (1) of

subdivision (j) shall apply.

   (2) Any other public utility pipeline system for which

construction is completed on or after January 1, 1996, other than a

pipeline system the entire length of which is subject to the

Lempert-Keene-Seastrand Oil Spill Prevention and Response Act,

(Division 7.8 (commencing with Section 8750) of the Public Resources

Code). If part, but not all, of a pipeline system is subject to the

Lempert-Keene-Seastrand Oil Spill Prevention and Response Act, any

evidence of financial responsibility that satisfies that act, and

that meets the conditions of this section, shall be credited toward

the requirements of this section.

   (3) Any major relocation of three miles or greater of a portion of

a pipeline system along substantially new alignments accomplished

through the exercise of eminent domain. This section shall not apply

to the portions of the pipeline not relocated.

   (i) This section shall not apply to the following:

   (1) A pipeline system in existence prior to January 1, 1996, that

is converted to a public utility prior or subsequent to January 1,

1996.

   (2) A public utility pipeline system not otherwise subject to this

section, that is the object of repair, replacement or maintenance,

unless that activity constitutes relocation as described in paragraph

(3) of subdivision (h).

   (j) (1) No pipeline system subject to this section shall be

permitted to operate unless the State Fire Marshal certifies that the

pipeline corporation demonstrates sufficient financial

responsibility to respond to the liability imposed by this section.

The minimum financial responsibility required by the State Fire

Marshal shall be seven hundred fifty dollars ($750) times the maximum

capacity of the pipeline in the number of barrels per day up to a

maximum of one hundred million dollars ($100,000,000) per pipeline

system, or a maximum of two hundred million dollars ($200,000,000)

per multiple pipeline systems.

   (2) For the purposes of this section, financial responsibility

shall be demonstrated by evidence that is substantially equivalent to

that required by regulations issued under Section 8670.37.54 of the

Government Code, including insurance, surety bond, letter of credit,

guaranty, qualification as a self-insurer, or combination thereof or

any other evidence of financial responsibility. The State Fire

Marshal shall require the documentation evidencing financial

responsibility to be placed on file with that office, and shall

administer the documentation in a manner substantially equivalent to

that provided by regulations issued under Section 8670.37.54 of the

Government Code. Financial responsibility shall be available for

payment of claims for damages described in subdivision (c) of any

party, including, but not limited to, the State of California, local

governments, special districts, and private parties, that obtains a

final judgment therefor against the pipeline corporation.

   (k) The State Fire Marshal shall require evidence of financial

responsibility to fund postclosure cleanup costs. The evidence of

financial responsibility shall be 15 percent of the amount of

financial responsibility required under subdivision (j) and shall be

maintained by the pipeline corporation for four years from the date

the pipeline is fully idled pursuant to a closure plan approved by

the State Fire Marshal.

   (l) “Fraction” of crude oil means a group of compounds collected

by fractional distillation that condenses within the same temperature

band, or a material that consists primarily of that group of

compounds or of a mixture of those groups of compounds.

   (m) (1) Notwithstanding Section 228 of the Public Utilities Code,

for purposes of this section, “pipeline corporation” means every

corporation or person directly operating, managing or owning any

pipeline system that qualifies as a public utility within Section 216

of the Public Utilities Code and for compensation within this state.

   (2) For purposes of this section, “owning” refers to the legal

entity owning the pipeline system itself and does not include legal

entities having an ownership interest, in whole or in part, in the

entity owning the pipeline system or multiple pipeline systems.

   (3) “Pipeline system” means a collective assemblage of intrastate

line pipe, valves, and other appurtenances connected to line pipe,

pumping units, fabricated assemblies associated with pumping units,

metering and delivery station, and fabricated assemblies constructed

for the same purpose at substantially the same time that form a

facility through which crude oil or a fraction thereof moves in

transportation.

 

3333.7.  (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person

who suffers injury that is proximately caused by the driver of a

commercial motor vehicle shall be entitled to recover treble damages

from the driver’s employer where it is shown both that the driver of

a commercial motor vehicle was under the influence of alcohol or a

controlled substance at the time that the injury was caused and that

the driver’s employer willfully failed at the time of the injury to

comply with any of the requirements of federal law described in

subdivision (a) of Section 34520 of the Vehicle Code in regard to the

involved driver.

   (b) For the purposes of subdivision (a), “willfully failed” has

the same meaning as “willful failure” as defined in paragraph (3) of

subdivision (c) of Section 34623 of the Vehicle Code.

   (c) For purposes of subdivision (a), an “employer” is a person or

entity who employs the driver or who contracts with an

owner-operator, who meets the requirements set forth in subdivision

(b) of Section 34624 of the Vehicle Code, to provide transportation

services, and who is required to engage in mandatory substance abuse

testing pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 34520 of the Vehicle

Code. This subdivision shall not be construed to change the

definition of “employer,” “employee,” or “independent contractor” for

any purpose.

   (d) Nothing in this section is intended to preclude or affect

existing rights.

 

  1. (a) The detriment caused by the wrongful occupation of real

property, in cases not embraced in Section 3335 of this code, the

Eminent Domain Law (Title 7 (commencing with Section 1230.010) of

Part 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure), or Section 1174 of the Code

of Civil Procedure, is deemed to include the value of the use of the

property for the time of that wrongful occupation, not exceeding five

years next preceding the commencement of the action or proceeding to

enforce the right to damages, the reasonable cost of repair or

restoration of the property to its original condition, and the costs,

if any, of recovering the possession.

   (b) (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), for purposes of

subdivision (a), the value of the use of the property shall be the

greater of the reasonable rental value of that property or the

benefits obtained by the person wrongfully occupying the property by

reason of that wrongful occupation.

   (2) If a wrongful occupation of real property subject to this

section is the result of a mistake of fact of the wrongful occupier,

the value of the use of the property, for purposes of subdivision

(a), shall be the reasonable rental value of the property.

 

  1. For willfully holding over real property, by a person who

entered upon the same, as guardian or trustee for an infant, or by

right of an estate terminable with any life or lives, after the

termination of the trust or particular estate, without the consent of

the party immediately entitled after such termination, the measure

of damages is the value of the profits received during such holding

over.

 

  1. The detriment caused by the wrongful conversion of personal

property is presumed to be:

   First–The value of the property at the time of the conversion,

with the interest from that time, or, an amount sufficient to

indemnify the party injured for the loss which is the natural,

reasonable and proximate result of the wrongful act complained of and

which a proper degree of prudence on his part would not have

averted; and

   Second–A fair compensation for the time and money properly

expended in pursuit of the property.

 

  1. The presumption declared by the last section cannot be

repelled, in favor of one whose possession was wrongful from the

beginning, by his subsequent application of the property to the

benefit of the owner, without his consent.

 

  1. One having a mere lien on personal property, cannot recover

greater damages for its conversion, from one having a right thereto

superior to his, after his lien is discharged, than the amount

secured by the lien, and the compensation allowed by Section 3336 for

loss of time and expenses.

 

  1. The Legislature finds and declares the following:

   (a) All protections, rights, and remedies available under state

law, except any reinstatement remedy prohibited by federal law, are

available to all individuals regardless of immigration status who

have applied for employment, or who are or who have been employed, in

this state.

   (b) For purposes of enforcing state labor, employment, civil

rights, and employee housing laws, a person’s immigration status is

irrelevant to the issue of liability, and in proceedings or discovery

undertaken to enforce those state laws no inquiry shall be permitted

into a person’s immigration status except where the person seeking

to make this inquiry has shown by clear and convincing evidence that

this inquiry is necessary in order to comply with federal immigration

law.

   (c) The provisions of this section are declaratory of existing

law.

   (d) The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision

of this section or its application is held invalid, that invalidity

shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given

effect without the invalid provision or application.

 

  1. For wrongful injuries to animals being subjects of property,

committed willfully or by gross negligence, in disregard of humanity,

exemplary damages may be given.

 

  1. The owner, possessor, or harborer of any dog or other animal,

that shall, on the premises of any person other than the owner,

possessor, or harborer of such dog or other animal, kill, worry, or

wound any bovine animal, swine, horse, mule, burro, sheep, angora

goat, or cashmere goat, or poultry, shall be liable to the owner of

the same for the damages and costs of suit, to be recovered in any

court of competent jurisdiction:

  1. In the prosecution of actions under the provisions of this

chapter, it shall not be necessary for the plaintiff to show that the

owner, possessor, or harborer of such dog or other animal, had

knowledge of the fact that such dog or other animal would kill, wound

or worry bovine animals, swine, horses, mules, burros, sheep, goats,

or poultry.

  1. Any person on finding any dog or dogs, or other animal, not on

the premises of the owner or possessor of such dog or dogs, or other

animal, worrying, wounding, or killing any bovine animals, swine,

horses, mules, burros, sheep, angora or cashmere goats, may, at the

time of finding such dog or dogs, or other animal, kill the same, and

the owner or owners thereof shall sustain no action for damages

against any person so killing such dog or dogs, or other animal.

   Nothing in this section shall render an owner, possessor, or

harborer of a dog liable for the accidental or unavoidable killing or

injury of any bovine animal, swine, horse, mule, burro, sheep,

angora goat, cashmere goat, or poultry which occurs in connection

with or as a incident to the driving or herding the same from the

premises of the owner, possessor, or harborer of the dog, whether

such killing or injury occurs upon such premises or off of such

premises.

 

  1. (a) The owner of any dog is liable for the damages suffered

by any person who is bitten by the dog while in a public place or

lawfully in a private place, including the property of the owner of

the dog, regardless of the former viciousness of the dog or the owner’

s knowledge of such viciousness. A person is lawfully upon the

private property of such owner within the meaning of this section

when he is on such property in the performance of any duty imposed

upon him by the laws of this state or by the laws or postal

regulations of the United States, or when he is on such property upon

the invitation, express or implied, of the owner.

   (b) Nothing in this section shall authorize the bringing of an

action pursuant to subdivision (a) against any governmental agency

using a dog in military or police work if the bite or bites occurred

while the dog was defending itself from an annoying, harassing, or

provoking act, or assisting an employee of the agency in any of the

following:

   (1) In the apprehension or holding of a suspect where the employee

has a reasonable suspicion of the suspect’s involvement in criminal

activity.

   (2) In the investigation of a crime or possible crime.

   (3) In the execution of a warrant.

   (4) In the defense of a peace officer or another person.

   (c) Subdivision (b) shall not apply in any case where the victim

of the bite or bites was not a party to, nor a participant in, nor

suspected to be a party to or a participant in, the act or acts that

prompted the use of the dog in the military or police work.

   (d) Subdivision (b) shall apply only where a governmental agency

using a dog in military or police work has adopted a written policy

on the necessary and appropriate use of a dog for the police or

military work enumerated in subdivision (b).

 

3342.5.  (a) The owner of any dog that has bitten a human being

shall have the duty to take such reasonable steps as are necessary to

remove any danger presented to other persons from bites by the

animal.

   (b) Whenever a dog has bitten a human being on at least two

separate occasions, any person, the district attorney, or city

attorney may bring an action against the owner of the animal to

determine whether conditions of the treatment or confinement of the

dog or other circumstances existing at the time of the bites have

been changed so as to remove the danger to other persons presented by

the animal. This action shall be brought in the county where a bite

occurred. The court, after hearing, may make any order it deems

appropriate to prevent the recurrence of such an incident, including,

but not limited to, the removal of the animal from the area or its

destruction if necessary.

   (c) Whenever a dog trained to fight, attack, or kill has bitten a

human being, causing substantial physical injury, any person,

including the district attorney, or city attorney may bring an action

against the owner of the animal to determine whether conditions of

the treatment or confinement of the dog or other circumstances

existing at the time of the bites have been changed so as to remove

the danger to other persons presented by the animal. This action

shall be brought in the county where a bite occurred. The court,

after hearing, may make any order it deems appropriate to prevent the

recurrence of such an incident, including, but not limited to, the

removal of the animal from the area or its destruction if necessary.

   (d) Nothing in this section shall authorize the bringing of an

action pursuant to subdivision (b) based on a bite or bites inflicted

upon a trespasser, or by a dog used in military or police work if

the bite or bites occurred while the dog was actually performing in

that capacity.

   (e) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent

legislation in the field of dog control by any city, county, or city

and county.

   (f) Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect the

liability of the owner of a dog under Section 3342 or any other

provision of the law.

   (g) A proceeding under this section is a limited civil case.

 

  1. (a) One defrauded in the purchase, sale or exchange of

property is entitled to recover the difference between the actual

value of that with which the defrauded person parted and the actual

value of that which he received, together with any additional damage

arising from the particular transaction, including any of the

following:

   (1) Amounts actually and reasonably expended in reliance upon the

fraud.

   (2) An amount which would compensate the defrauded party for loss

of use and enjoyment of the property to the extent that any such loss

was proximately caused by the fraud.

   (3) Where the defrauded party has been induced by reason of the

fraud to sell or otherwise part with the property in question, an

amount which will compensate him for profits or other gains which

might reasonably have been earned by use of the property had he

retained it.

   (4) Where the defrauded party has been induced by reason of the

fraud to purchase or otherwise acquire the property in question, an

amount which will compensate him for any loss of profits or other

gains which were reasonably anticipated and would have been earned by

him from the use or sale of the property had it possessed the

characteristics fraudulently attributed to it by the party committing

the fraud, provided that lost profits from the use or sale of the

property shall be recoverable only if and only to the extent that all

of the following apply:

   (i) The defrauded party acquired the property for the purpose of

using or reselling it for a profit.

   (ii) The defrauded party reasonably relied on the fraud in

entering into the transaction and in anticipating profits from the

subsequent use or sale of the property.

   (iii) Any loss of profits for which damages are sought under this

paragraph have been proximately caused by the fraud and the defrauded

party’s reliance on it.

   (b) Nothing in this section shall do either of the following:

   (1) Permit the defrauded person to recover any amount measured by

the difference between the value of property as represented and the

actual value thereof.

   (2) Deny to any person having a cause of action for fraud or

deceit any legal or equitable remedies to which such person may be

entitled.

 

3343.5.  (a) Any one or more of the following who suffers any damage

proximately resulting from one or more acts of unlawful motor

vehicle subleasing, as described in Chapter 12.7 (commencing with

Section 570) of Title 13 of Part 1 of the Penal Code, may bring an

action against the person who has engaged in those acts:

   (1) A seller or other secured party under a conditional sale

contract or a security agreement.

   (2) A lender under a direct loan agreement.

   (3) A lessor under a lease contract.

   (4) A buyer under a conditional sale contract.

   (5) A purchaser under a direct loan agreement, an agreement which

provides for a security interest, or an agreement which is equivalent

to these types of agreements.

   (6) A lessee under a lease contract.

   (7) An actual or purported transferee or assignee of any right or

interest of a buyer, a purchaser, or a lessee.

   (b) The court in an action under subdivision (a) may award actual

damages; equitable relief, including, but not limited to, an

injunction and restitution of money and property; punitive damages;

reasonable attorney’s fees and costs; and any other relief which the

court deems proper.

   (c) As used in this section, the following terms have the

following meanings:

   (1) “Buyer” has the meaning set forth in subdivision (c) of

Section 2981.

   (2) “Conditional sale contract” has the meaning set forth in

subdivision (a) of Section 2981. Notwithstanding subdivision (k) of

Section 2981, “conditional sale contract” includes any contract for

the sale or bailment of a motor vehicle between a buyer and a seller

primarily for business or commercial purposes.

   (3) “Direct loan agreement” means an agreement between a lender

and a purchaser whereby the lender has advanced funds pursuant to a

loan secured by the motor vehicle which the purchaser has purchased.

   (4) “Lease contract” means a lease contract between a lessor and

lessee as this term and these parties are defined in Section 2985.7.

Notwithstanding subdivision (d) of Section 2985.7, “lease contract”

includes a lease for business or commercial purposes.

   (5) “Motor vehicle” means any vehicle required to be registered

under the Vehicle Code.

   (6) “Person” means an individual, company, firm, association,

partnership, trust, corporation, limited liability company, or other

legal entity.

   (7) “Purchaser” has the meaning set forth in paragraph (30) of

subdivision (b) of Section 1201 of the Commercial Code.

   (8) “Security agreement” and “secured party” have the meanings set

forth, respectively, in paragraphs (73) and (72) of subdivision (a)

of Section 9102 of the Commercial Code. “Security interest” has the

meaning set forth in paragraph (35) of subdivision (b) of Section

1201 of the Commercial Code.

   (9) “Seller” has the meaning set forth in subdivision (b) of

Section 2981, and includes the present holder of the conditional sale

contract.

   (d) The rights and remedies provided in this section are in

addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law.

 

3343.7.  An action may be brought against any nonprofit organization

operated on a cooperative basis by and for independent retailers

which wholesales goods and services primarily to its member retailers

as described in paragraph (3) of subdivision (d) of Section 20001 of

the Business and Professions Code or subdivision (c) of Section

31005 of the Corporations Code, for rescission of a membership

contract entered into, or for any damages sustained, as a consequence

of being fraudulently induced to join the organization. For purposes

of this section, “fraudulently induced” means the misrepresentation

of a material fact, or the omission of a material fact, including the

failure of the organization to disclose all information required

under subparagraph (H) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (d) of Section

20001 of the Business and Professions Code or paragraph (8) of

subdivision (c) of Section 31005 of the Corporations Code, unless the

defendant proves that the plaintiff knew the facts concerning the

untruth or omission or that the defendant exercised reasonable care

and did not know (or if the defendant had exercised reasonable care

would not have known) of the untruth or omission.

 

2009 California Civil Code – Section 3353-3360 :: Article 4. General Provisions

CIVIL CODE

SECTION 3353-3360

  1. In estimating damages, the value of property to a seller

thereof is deemed to be the price which he could have obtained

therefor in the market nearest to the place at which it should have

been accepted by the buyer, and at such time after the breach of the

contract as would have sufficed, with reasonable diligence, for the

seller to effect a resale.

 

  1. In estimating damages, except as provided by Section 3355 and

3356, the value of property, to a buyer or owner thereof, deprived

of its possession, is deemed to be the price at which he might have

bought an equivalent thing in the market nearest to the place where

the property ought to have been put into his possession, and at such

time after the breach of duty upon which his right to damages is

founded as would suffice, with reasonable diligence, for him to make

such a purchase.

 

  1. Where certain property has a peculiar value to a person

recovering damages for deprivation thereof, or injury thereto, that

may be deemed to be its value against one who had notice thereof

before incurring a liability to damages in respect thereof, or

against a willful wrongdoer.

 

[3356.]  Section Thirty-three Hundred and Fifty-six. For the purpose

of estimating damages, the value of an instrument in writing is

presumed to be equal to that of the property to which it entitles its

owner.

 

  1. The damages prescribed by this Chapter are exclusive of

exemplary damages and interest, except where those are expressly

mentioned.

 

  1. Except as expressly provided by statute, no person can

recover a greater amount in damages for the breach of an obligation,

than he could have gained by the full performance thereof on both

sides.

 

  1. Damages must, in all cases, be reasonable, and where an

obligation of any kind appears to create a right to unconscionable

and grossly oppressive damages, contrary to substantial justice, no

more than reasonable damages can be recovered.

 

  1. When a breach of duty has caused no appreciable detriment to

the party affected, he may yet recover nominal damages.